Our rankings combine a fixed ranking system with ongoing editorial review. This page covers the method, the factors that shape a position, how Maximus works, when we reassess a casino app, our star ratings and how partnerships fit in.
Our ranking methodology
Every casino app is handled with the same approach, so listings stay aligned across all markets.
Information is structured so that apps can be compared directly, while still accounting for differences between regions, such as app availability, supported devices or the regulatory context. Before a ranking is finalised, we check that it reflects accurate and up-to-date information.
This keeps rankings consistent while letting them stay relevant for each market.
What shapes the ranking
A ranking reflects how several elements come together within one consistent structure. No single factor decides a position: the overall picture does.
Combined inputs
Each ranking is based on a range of inputs considered together, not on a single metric.
Market relevance
Listings are adjusted for your location, app availability and what you can actually access in your market.
Comparative positioning
Each casino app is positioned against the others in the same list, so the comparison is fair and consistent.
Structural consistency
The same approach applies to every ranking, which keeps the structure aligned while allowing for market-specific differences.
Our internal ranking system: Maximus
To manage rankings across our network, we use an internal system called Maximus. It defines how casino apps are compared and positioned, and applies the same structure to every ranking instead of relying on manual placement.
The inputs come from our evaluation process. We assess each casino app on bonus terms and conditions, game selection and mobile optimisation, payment options, customer support, licensing, country access and user feedback signals. These factors are reviewed with a structured framework, which you can read about in our casino app review process. Together, they are the basis on which each casino app is measured.
Maximus processes this information with a fixed set of rules. It weighs several factors at the same time, so a position reflects the combination of app performance, accessibility and overall offering rather than any single input.
Because the same structure and criteria apply to every casino app, rankings rest on comparable inputs, not on individual preference. This is how we manage listings across more than 70 local websites while adapting each ranking to what is available and relevant in that market.
What Maximus does
- Uses the inputs from our casino app evaluation framework.
- Structures the information so all casino apps are assessed on equal terms.
- Applies fixed rules to interpret several factors together.
- Sets ranking positions from the combined inputs.
- Adjusts listings to your location and app availability.
- Keeps rankings consistent across 70+ local websites and multiple languages.
Ongoing review and updates
Maximus sets rankings from structured data, and that data comes from our editorial work. Our team reviews casino apps, assigns scores and revisits them when verified changes occur. When something important changes, such as licensing, app functionality, terms or operations, we adjust the score and Maximus reflects the change in the rankings.
When we reassess a ranking
We step in when verified issues or material changes affect a casino app's standing, including:
- Risks to player safety or trust.
- Licensing issues or regulatory changes.
- Payment disruptions or policy concerns.
- A lack of transparency or unclear terms.
What we do and what we avoid
What we do
- Apply clear evaluation standards consistently.
- Reassess casino apps when verified changes occur.
- Verify licensing and operational information.
- Keep the same structured ranking logic across markets.
- Update listings when material details change.
What we avoid
- Adjusting rankings because of short-term promotions.
- Overlooking important updates or player concerns.
- Relying only on marketing claims.
- Promising guaranteed positions.
- Leaving information unreviewed for long periods.
Our star rating system
Our team uses a structured star rating to show how each casino app performed in our evaluation. It gives one clear, consistent result for every app we assess. This is what each score level stands for:
| Score | What it means |
|---|---|
| 10.0 | Exceptional long-term stability and compliance record. |
| 9.0 | Broad operational reliability across markets. |
| 8.0 | Very strong regulatory standing and transparent policies. |
| 7.0 | High level of consistency and structured player protection. |
| 6.0 | Above-average performance with clear operational stability. |
| 5.0 | Strong overall standards with few material concerns. |
| 4.0 | Consistent and reliable in most key areas. |
| 3.0 | Acceptable performance with room for improvement. |
| 2.0 | Meets minimum standards but shows notable limitations. |
| 1.0 | Significant weaknesses in reliability, clarity or player safeguards. |
How partnerships fit into our evaluation
We work on an affiliate model: we receive compensation when you visit or register with a casino app through our links. That revenue pays for the website and for detailed reviews across different markets. Partnerships also give us structured access to updates, such as changes to licensing, payment methods, app features or promotional terms. We review and verify this information before it goes into our content.
Compensation does not decide how we rank casino apps. The commercial model supports our work, but it does not dictate our evaluations or final scores.
The result is a ranking that combines a fixed system with ongoing editorial input, so each position reflects current information and clearly defined standards. To learn more about who we are and how we work, see our About us page.
